A Fertilized Egg Is Not a Person In Illinois

An Illinois appellate court on Friday reversed a 2005 lower court decision, ruling that a fertilized, unimplanted egg is not a person.

The case was originally brought to a Cook County judge as a wrongful death suit when an Illinois couple sued their fertility clinic for "tens of thousands of dollars" for inadvertently destroying the unimplanted eggs stored at the clinic.

According to Colleen Connell, Executive Director of the ACLU of Illinois,

"The lower court had accepted the argument that a human being is created when an egg is fertilized, regardless of whether the fertilized egg is implanted in a woman’s body or left in a Petri dish. Left undisturbed, the lower court’s decision could have limited the ability of women in Illinois to access contraceptive services and genetic testing. Moreover, the decision would curb the ability of couples in Illinois to use reproductive technologies, such as in vitro fertilization, in starting a family."

Connell also writes, on the ACLU blog, that the original lower court’s ruling that a fertilized, unimplanted egg is a human being was based on "antiquated Illinois abortion laws" that were almost continually challenged based on their unconstitutionality – laws that were blocked from enforcement by federal courts. According to the amicus brief (friend of the court report) filed by the ACLU of Illinois and partners, the laws actually contained provisions specifying how physicians must conduct an abortion; define an abortifacient in such a "manner that interfered with the right to birth control"; lay out abortion reporting requirements that interfere with patient privacy and more.

This ruling comes at an excellent time for reproductive justice advocates who are busy fighting a variety of measures meant to attack women’s rights to contraception and family planning in more covert ways.  As Connell notes:

The rhetoric used in Illinois around this decision fits a disturbing trend that we have seen across the nation — namely, that anti-abortion extremists now are focusing their attention increasingly on limiting access not simply to abortion but to contraception as well. In Colorado, for example, a ballot measure set to be decided this November would grant “personhood” to a fertilized egg, meaning that many forms of contraception that could prevent a fertilized egg from attaching to the uterus could be targeted for legislative bans. This effort seems to reveal the real agenda of the anti-abortion activists — to allow government bureaucrats — not women — the power to make decisions about birth control, abortion, genetic testing and pregnancy. 

Opponents of the Colorado measure, cited above, are set to rally on Wednesday in Denver to let people know how dangerous the implications of this measure are. 

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

For more information or to schedule an interview with contact press@rhrealitycheck.org.

  • invalid-0

    Good! Unfortunately, though, the issue is probably ultimately headed to the Supreme Court. I shudder to think what will happen if McCain is around to appoint more “strict constructionists.”

  • invalid-0

    This Godless judge needs a Biology 101 class!!

    Even Harry Blackmun admitted that if the Personhood of the
    pre-born was ever established, the house of cards that is Roe
    would collapse.

    “An abortion kills the life of a baby after it has begun. It is dangerous to your life and health. It may make you sterile, so that when you want a child you cannot have it.” — Planned Parenthood[11]

    In 1981, the United States Congress conducted hearings to answer the question, “When does human life begin?” A group of internationally known scientists appeared before a Senate judiciary subcommittee.

    The U.S. Congress was told by Harvard University Medical School’s Professor Micheline Matthews-Roth, “In biology and in medicine, it is an accepted fact that the life of any individual organism reproducing by sexual reproduction begins at conception….”

    Dr. Watson A. Bowes, Jr., of the University of Colorado Medical School, testified that “the beginning of a single human life is from a biological point of view a simple and straightforward matter—the beginning is conception. This straightforward biological fact should not be distorted to serve sociological, political or economic goals.”

    Dr. Alfred Bongiovanni of the University of Pennsylvania Medical School noted: “The standard medical texts have long taught that human life begins at conception.”

    He added: “I am no more prepared to say that these early stages represent an incomplete human being than I would be to say that the child prior to the dramatic effects of puberty… is not a human being. This is human life at every stage albeit incomplete until late adolescence.”

    Dr. McCarthy De Mere, who is a practicing physician as well as a law professor at the University of Tennessee, testified: “The exact moment of the beginning [of] personhood and of the human body is at the moment of conception.”

    World-famous geneticist Dr. Jerome Lejeune, professor of fundamental genetics at the University of Descarte, Paris, France, declared, “each individual has a very unique beginning, the moment of its conception.”

    Dr. Lejeune also emphasized: “The human nature of the human being from conception to old age is not a metaphysical contention, it is plain experimental evidence.”

    The chairman of the Department of Medical Genetics at the Mayo Clinic, Professor Hymie Gordon, testified, “By all the criteria of modern molecular biology, life is present from the moment of conception.”