ACLU: “America’s Toughest Sheriff” Not Above the Law

The ACLU filed a motion today to hold Arizona’s Maricopa County’s Sheriff Joe Arpaio in contempt of court for refusing to comply with an order that allows for female prisoners in Arizona to be transported by jail officials to access abortion – abortion services that are paid for by the prisoners themselves.

Apparently, under Sheriff Arpaio’s orders his county jail had an "unofficial rule" that jail officials should not provide transportation to female prisoners seeking an abortion. A case was brought before the Superior Court of Arizona, in August 2005 – a full three years ago, where the court ruled that this was in violation of women’s reproductive rights and struck down the policy. But Arpaio paid no attention and continued to play by his own rules.

Forward to May 2008 when a female prisoner ("Mary Roe") requested transportation so that she could access abortion services and again was turned down by jail officials. Roe’s lawyer even stepped in and talked to "Sheriff Joe’s" Deputy Chief (an official who was aware of the court order requiring transportation services for female prisoners) and Roe’s request was still turned down.

The ACLU had to step in to make sure Arpaio followed the law – albeit 4 weeks later, thereby postponing Roe’s abortion.

"The courts have already confirmed our position that Arizona prison
officials cannot ignore the medical needs of prisoners simply because they do
not agree with the decision to end a pregnancy," said Alessandra Soler
Meetze, Executive Director of the ACLU of Arizona. "Now, given the
disregard of the court ruling by Sheriff Arpaio and his staff, it appears that
we need to spell out the law more clearly to protect future women

According to the ACLU, the motion asks that the court require jails to post signs in English and Spanish that let women know of their right to transportation. In addition, the motion asks that employees be required to sign a statement acknowledging that they have been informed of the law.

But, the larger story here is that it is long past time for federal authorities to step in and acknowledge that Sheriff Arpaio and his fellow county jail officials seem to be behaving as if they are above the law. This is just one of three separate cases that the ACLU has filed against Sheriff Joe and his alleged criminal gang. He, along with the Sheriff’s office and Maricopa County are being sued by a coalition of five different immigrants rights organizations (along with the ACLU) for racial profiling of Latinos.

It is also worth noting that the barriers to accessing legal abortion Sheriff Joe and his colleagues have illegally constructed are exactly why the legal right to abortion is moot for many populations of women in this country. 

Legal and safe abortion is protected under our constitution in Roe v. Wade. But when ideologues who believe that they know best bar women from accessing what they legally have a right to access, this becomes discriminatory and criminal. 

There seems to be a clear link to "right of refusal" clauses and pharmacy refusals. The right of health care providers to exercise their religious freedom and the rights of pharmacists to do the same must be weighed against what, legally, women have a right to access. These "rights" must include women’s rights to access timely, quality health care services free from discrimination and in accord with our federal laws. 

Taken together, these consistent barriers – some vaguely legal and some not – may constitute legal discrimination against women (are we talking about any other "class" of people?!) and should be treated as such. 

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

For more information or to schedule an interview with contact

  • invalid-0

    This guy’s a total fuckwit. I’ve been reading about his antics on and off for the last several years. Before this current fiasco, the one that got me the most riled up was how he treated Robert Daniels. Daniels was a guy with multi-drug resistant TB. There was apparently some miscommunication, and Daniels didn’t wear a mask when he went outside. So the county got an order to detain, and he wound up in Sheriff Joe’s jail.

    That’s right. Not a hospital. Not a sanitorium. In jail. (To be precise, the hospital ward of the jail.) The poor guy was kept incommunicado, was watched 24/7, and wasn’t even allowed to take a shower.

    It was only after Andrew Speaker, the TB-positive lawyer who snuck across the U.S. border, hit the news that Daniels’ treatment started to get better. His medical care up until that point had sucked, and when Speaker got to go to Denver Jewish for the most up-to-date TB treatment, Daniels sued to go, too.

    Apparently the only way Joe would let him out was for him to sign a statement saying that he would return for indictment. WTF? Anyway, Daniels metaphorically flipped Joe the bird when his treatment was done, and he left the country.

    So, Joe seems to get his jollies out of withholding medical care. The local newspapers I read didn’t seem to find that problematic at all. Can’t someone run against this loser?

  • invalid-0

    There is a lot that can be useful in today’s ongoing battle for self-protection in the successful strategies of the suffragettes.

    Unfortunately, most people are quite a bit in the dark about the suffragettes.

    Now finding out the sexy, shocking truth of HOW the suffragettes won the vote is as easy as opening your e-mail.

    “The Privilege of Voting” is a new historical e-mail series that goes behind the scenes in the lives of eight well-known women from 1912 to 1920 to reveal the exciting and surprising twists and turns that played into women finally winning the vote in England and America.

    The women depicted include two of the most beautiful and outspoken suffragettes — Alice Paul and Emmeline Pankhurst, along with Edith Wharton, Isadora Duncan, Alice Roosevelt, and two stunning presidential mistresses.

    There are weddings and funerals, babies in peril, damsels in distress, war, peace, prohibition, broken hearts and lots of hot affairs on the rocky road to the ballot box.

    The best part is it’s ALL true!

    Presented via e-mail in a unique, sequential, interwoven short-story format called Coffeebreak Readers that makes discovering the delightful heroines of women’s suffrage history fast and fun!

    Each action-packed e-mail episode takes about 10 minutes to read, so they are perfect to enjoy on coffeebreaks, or anytime.

    You can subscribe to receive free twice-weekly e-mails at: