True Reality Television: Where’s Abortion?

It would be difficult to imagine the reaction if Americans turned on their television sets tonight and watched their favorite sitcom's leading characters debate and then decide, without regrets or "lucky" miscarriages, on an abortion. No doubt the various advocacy groups would draw their political swords, some calling for boycotts and federal regulation while others praised the modernization of television programming.

The abortion debate, for better or for worse, is one of the most divisive in America. But, to be honest, it hasn't always been that way. The debate and the divisiveness is by design.

In the 1916 silent movie "Where Are My Children?" a woman dies after a botched abortion. At the same time a sentimental district attorney, who loves children, discovers that his wife has had an abortion in order to preserve her social life. Despite all of this, however, the word "abortion" is never uttered.

That was probably the first time prior to the Sixties — a time when overlapping organizations of women, medical professionals, public health administrators, legal scholars and religious leaders successfully convinced a third of all states to liberalize abortion statutes — that abortion was featured in film or on television. The next time a semi-open segment on the topic happened was during the soap opera "Another World" in 1964. Fictional character Pat Matthews became pregnant by her tomcat boyfriend. He persuades her to have an abortion, although the word was never used. As the characters discuss the "illegal operation," the woman realized that the boyfriend never intended to follow through with his agreement to marry her. Matthews is driven mad and, in a fit of rage, murders the boyfriend.

Eight years pass between that soap opera storyline and the next time abortion is addressed on television. This time, however, the word is used and there is no dramatic aftermath of the decision to end a pregnancy. In the prime-time sitcom "Maude," the lead character, played by actress Bea Arthur, realizes she is pregnant in her late forties. Although the episode aired prior to the Supreme Court's 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, the sitcom was set in New York, where abortion was already legal. The family — Maude, her husband and grown daughter — have frank and thoughtful discussions about the decision.

"When you were young, abortion was a dirty word. It's not anymore," says Maude's daughter as she encourages her mother to have the abortion.

In the second part, when Maude decides not to continue the pregnancy, her husband Walter assures her, "In the privacy of our own lives, you're doing the right thing."

The sitcom, developed as a spin-off of the often thought-provoking "All in the Family," has remained possibly the only time the American public has had an opportunity to watch a realistic conversation about pregnancy and abortion.

As Rachel Fudge noted in a 2005 feature story, the episode of "Maude" was groundbreaking, but it also "inadvertently galvanized the anti-choice movement." It was that episode's unabashed treatment of the issue that led those who oppose abortion to petition the Federal Communications Commission for equal time under the Fairness Doctrine. Although the group did not win their case, the arguments began what many now feel is the application of the Fairness Doctrine, which was abandoned in the 1980s, on entertainment programming.

Once the episode of "Maude" aired, those opposed to abortion had their first flag to rally around. Although the two-part episode had been scheduled to rerun six months later (after Roe had been handed down), letters of protest pushed many CBS affiliates to refuse to re-air it.

In contrast, about 20 years later when similar, although unmarried, sitcom character Murphy Brown faced an unplanned pregnancy, the word abortion was never mentioned. The "dirty word" status was back in full force for television programming, a place it continues to reside to this day.

After Roe v. Wade, the abortion debate became more focused and public. Although both groups discuss the same things, they each choose their exact words carefully. It's a comparison so easily made that those few television shows that do enter into fringe discussions about abortion have ready made pluck and drop stereotypes for their actors.

Most television characters either spontaneously miscarry or discover a false positive pregnancy test. Two shows — ABC's soap opera "General Hospital" and the Canadian produced "DeGrassi" series — have had characters who actually opt for abortion. On "General Hospital," the character receives a moral lecture about the decision from nearly every other character on the show, including the mobsters who make a living by the barrel of their guns. It remains to be seen if the woman who had the abortion will be forced to suffer untold consequences of her decision.

"DeGrassi: The Next Generation," on the other hand, allowed a young woman to have an abortion without regret and without a "God's gonna get ya" follow-up storyline. The character says that she's just trying to make "the best decision." Networks in the U.S. found the story to be so potentially offensive to American audiences that the episode has never aired in this country.

No doubt there is something to be said about the June and Ward Cleaver days of television. Families today are often greeted with images of sexual violence, general violence, infidelity, alcoholism and drug abuse when watching nightly television programming. But throughout all of the changes, despite all of the "awakenings" that have been carried forward by civil-rights movements, abortion continues to be the only truly boycotted discussion on television and in film. When part of a storyline, it is rarely mentioned by name and even more rarely carried out as a solution. More offensively, the other possible pregnancy outcomes — false positives, miscarriage, birth and adoption — are placed before viewers in neat, pretty packages. Rarely do viewers witness the guilt and grief that follow miscarriage. I don't know of any television programs that have placed a woman in grief counseling after giving a child up for adoption.

On television we can watch as our neighbors devour bugs and worms for money. We can see what happens when a person is asked to answer personal questions in front of friends and family while connected to a lie detector. We can peek in the windows of biracial or homosexual couples. We can be an operating room observer as various surgeries are performed. Through our television sets, it seems, we get nearly every possible opinion and viewpoint on nearly every possible topic. Just not abortion.

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

For more information or to schedule an interview with contact

  • invalid-0

    the networks would view any show which frankly discusses abortion like it was plutonium. This would likely leave it to a cable channel like HBO or Showtime, and they’ve shown they aren’t afraid to tackle thorny conundrums.
    If people still want to scream about the Fairness Doctrine, then have the show follow both the staff at an abortion clinic, and at a CPC. No off camera questions,no agenda,just let ’em roll and let the people speak for themselves. “Side note” stories can follow protestors, artisits,musicians,writers,et al on both sides. Whatever channel tackles this should ask Errol Morris if he would be interested in directing.

  • invalid-0

    It took a few years, but that episode of Degrassi (Accidents Will Happen) did air and is now part of the regular rotation on The N, Degrassi’s cable network home.

  • invalid-0

    for the opportunity to view a program like that directed by Errol Morris. Brilliant!

    Amie Newman

    Managing Editor, RH Reality Check

  • avedon

    The one letter I’ve ever gotten The Washington Post to publish was the one I wrote to offer my congratulations to the local affiliate for choosing to air that episode of Maude despite the fact that it was unable to sell any advertising for it.

    In that letter, I referred to other plots dealing with pregnancies that never should have been carried to term, including those that were very likely to end in the mother’s death. They never aborted, and somehow never died, either.

    But you forgot the one TV movie that did show a woman who wanted to have an abortion, couldn’t get one, and had to give her child up for adoption – and regretted it: Roe vs. Wade.

    More liberal media at The Sideshow

  • invalid-0

    Also let’s not forget the second season of MTV’s Real World, where what’s-her-name gets an abortion. We see her going to the doctor’s office, taking a few days off afterwards, and living her life normally afterwards. It was part of an episode with atleast one other storyline. Today it would have been extensive footage of her sick, crying, etc. Which while true for the original, was also surprisingly judgement-free (for the most part) and under-stated–unheard of in today’s reality television.

  • invalid-0

    Six Feet Under on HBO did a storyline on abortion. The character was in college and she made the decision to get one, and honestly, it was a little jarring to see her actually go through with it since we usually see women back out at the last second on TV. But I thought it was well done, real, and her emotions and reactions after the fact were very thought-provoking.

  • invalid-0

    Abortion is just an unpopular topic.

    Very few people actually have abortions.

  • invalid-0

    Very few people become fashion designers, district attorneys, run multinational corporations after marrying a millionaire after meeting him in a diner… very few things happen to people that happen to characters in a drama or soap opera.

    Abortions are discussed by and happen to far more people than suffer amnesia on a soap.

  • invalid-0

    ALOT of women have abortions, more than most of us think. Isn’t the figure 40% in the US? Higher in some other countries? The most common surgical procedure in the US? RH reality contributors know the score better than I, but I DO know that I have been at many a dinner table where a clueless anti-choicer is rambling on and I KNOW 2-3 women at the table have had abortions, and a vast web of women we all know have had them too. It’s just that no one has let the anti-choicer in on the secret yet. A culture without shot-gun teeange marriages, single parents of many children, or couples with way too many mouths to feed doesn’t just happen without women doing what women have to do from time to time.

    Don’t forget the Sex in the City show on abortion- Samantha says: “fess up , ladies, I’ve had two.” Carries owned up to one.

  • lynda-waddington

    I'll have to ask my teenager, who loves Degrassi, if she's seen the episode. Actually, I'd like to watch it myself.

    • invalid-0

      Why don’t you worry about other things besides abortion being on television. I think you need to get a life

  • lynda-waddington

    … isn't abortion still a thread in the fabric of society?


    Since I wrote this piece I've been considering the "why" – that is, when so many other things are put on television for public consumption and discussion, why isn't abortion? I do think the political climate plays a role, but, more than that, I think real-life abortion — i.e., how women think, discuss and come to decisions concerning abortion — just isn't as sexy (for lack of a better word) as television needs it to be.


    A friend and I were talking about the prevalence of "fortunate" miscarriages and false-positive pregnancy tests on television. She asked, "Doesn't it often seem like any unmarried female television character who engages in sexual activity is somehow punished for doing so?" While I wouldn't agree that any and every one of them are punished, I do have to admit that it appears many are. This especially holds true in the case of married people who have affairs. A male character who cheats may be a complete arse, but rarely do you see a man on television in anguish over what he has done. Female characters who cheat, on the other hand, are often not only somehow physically punished for doing so, but often suffer through episode after episode of self-inflicted mental strife as well.

  • invalid-0

    As a woman who lost her only child to adoption in 1972, the casual advocacy of adoption in the mainstream media infuriates me. Adoption is nothing more than a means to take children from women who are economically and socially powerless and transfer them to people who are lucky enough to be economically stable. Don’t pretend that most “open” adoptions don’t eventually close, with the mother kicked to the curb, either– agreements about openness in adoption are not legally binding, and adopters take full advantage of that.
    When will we see some honest depictions of what adoption means to the women who give birth and are so inconvenient to others?

  • invalid-0

    There actually was a tv segment on BravoCanada on life after adoption that featured real women talking about their adoption experiences. The segment aired on a program called “TalkinBlues.” It featured a blues song about women’s difficult decisions as well as clips from women talking about child loss to adoption as they experienced it.

    The segment is available on You Tube here: