Voices from the Sidelines


To begin with, both those of us who oppose and those who support legal abortion agree that there's unbearably little nuance in the public conversation on reproductive rights. But that's only the beginning of our common ground. While not one national anti-choice organization supports contraception or science-based sexuality education, many individuals who oppose legal abortion are making the connections on their own: birth control and education reduce the rate of unintended pregnancy and abortions.

Prevention

It's funny how the numbers align. Among the 42 million sexually active American women of reproductive age who don't want to become pregnant, 89% use contraception. It's intuitive, then, that plenty of people who oppose legal abortion aren't appalled by birth control.

Laura, a 25-year-old Catholic campus minister in West Virginia, opposes abortion, but her feelings about global warming lead her to part ways with the Church on birth control (while Laura asked that her real name not be used, names used in this article are real unless noted otherwise). The Church's catechism calls contraception "intrinsically evil." But "we, as a country, use so much of the world's resources," Laura says. "We've got to be responsible about how we bring people into this world and especially into this opulent culture." She supports reproductive health access as part of a full-scale reorientation of national priorities toward sustainability. Laura's lived in Jamaica, where she said radio ads promote condom use and musicians talk of HIV/AIDS in their songs. She's also lived in Maine, where emergency contraception is available without parental consent, her public high school offered off-site day care to young parents, and her college gave free condoms to anyone who wanted them. She applauds these efforts as responsible and realistic.

Laura's in good spiritual company: Seventy-eight percent of U.S. Catholics believe the pope should permit contraception. The majority may not be a new development. Catherine (not her real name), a 50-year-old Philadelphia woman who opposes legal abortion, remembers sex education in an all-girls Catholic school in the 1970s as fairly progressive. "To the credit of the teacher, she did explain the basics of sex and pregnancy prevention," Catherine says. "We thought it was rather amazing to be taught about birth control when we weren't supposed to be having sex." These days, Laura, as a modern-day Catholic, says, "the Church has made itself irrelevant on this issue. Its rigid position is not for the good of its people. And it makes it too easy to trivialize the Church on other matters."

Brittany Galisdorfer is a 24-year-old from Detroit who reconciles her support of contraception with her opposition to abortion by taking a scientific perspective. "A lot of people don't support contraception because they believe life starts at conception, which requires egg and sperm to meet," she says. "But you can put egg and sperm together all day without a baby coming together. It needs to attach itself to the uterus to make a baby. That's why contraception is okay. It simply denies the third element required for pregnancy."

The life-begins-at-conception belief fuels the mischaracterization of some methods of hormonal birth control as abortifacients. Anti-choicers often go after emergency contraception — simply two regular birth control pills taken within 72 hours of intercourse — in particular, but some organizations would like to ban all hormonal birth controls and IUDs, claiming they cause abortions.

Beth Bovair, a Catholic 24-year-old from Arlington who believes life begins at conception, sees no validity in the birth control platform of organizations that oppose abortion. While she opposes abortion, Beth says we need to build a supportive society before it is no longer an option.

"We have to provide for children and women, and create a society where there's no stigma of pregnancy for women and men," Beth said. And that society, according to Beth, includes access and use of contraception to support family planning.

It's a sentiment that Claire Keyes, co-founder of the Abortion Conversation Project, echoes. "What happens after the child is born?" Claire said. "All our energy and dollars seem to go for having more babies, not caring for them."

Knowledge

Iowa just became the seventeenth state to decline federal funds for abstinence-only education in public schools.

Why the trend?

"Research continues to show that abstinence-only education fails to delay sexual initiation, reduce numbers of sexual partners or prevent pregnancy in adolescents," said Iowa Gov. Chet Culver in Medical News Today.

It's hardly theoretical: While over a billion federal dollars fund abstinence-only education (and zero support comprehensive sex ed), people under 25 have become the fastest-growing category of new HIV infections. A CDC study recently announced that one in four teen girls has a sexually transmitted infection. Eight hundred thousand teens aged 15-19 become pregnant each year. A number of those pregnancies end in abortions.

Given these statistics, Beth Bovair would like to see nuance, not just abstinence, in the classroom. Plenty of students aren't sexually active, so they don't connect to the material, she noted. Brittany echoed the sentiment: "I wasn't planning on having sex until I was married, and most of my friends weren't having sex, so [sex education] didn't feel relevant," Brittany observed. So it's important, Beth said, to provide facts while acknowledging that any given classroom includes people who are sexually active and people who feel far from that experience.

Catherine, the Philadelphia woman struck by her Catholic school sex education, and her husband found their children's sex education in both public and private schools to be "totally inadequate." They became the primary teachers for their children's sexuality education.

These four women are hardly alone in their desire for better classroom experiences. A 2004 Kaiser Foundation nationwide poll found that 85% of parents would like teenagers to receive comprehensive age-appropriate sex education, in lieu of abstinence-only.

Who Represents Them?

Laura, Catherine, Brittany and Beth aren't members of any national anti-abortion organization. Those that are Catholics distinguish their perspectives from Church catechism. Beth is church-hopping in Washington, D.C., looking for a parish where her spiritual and political views have a home. While Laura attended the March for Life in January, she spent much of it with a local friend, indicating that she doesn't feel comfortable among "hardcore" anti-choicers.

Brittany, too, is distanced from the traditionally-portrayed anti-abortion community. "The people who I share (my opposition to abortion) with, I don't share much else," she said.

But the numbers reveal that the conclusions of these women aren't uncommon. Who, then, represents their voices in the public conversation? It's not the groups that challenge reproductive rights at every level. These women — representing many in their movement — are left to speak for themselves within a context that begs misunderstandings and mischaracterizations.

"I've never heard anyone say these things, period," Brittany said. "I'm disappointed in the media in particular. There's nothing to do but live my life the way I choose to and speak up when I feel it'll be productive."

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

To schedule an interview with Anna Clark please contact Communications Director Rachel Perrone at rachel@rhrealitycheck.org.

  • invalid-0

    I agree that much of the media focuses on the black and white of this issue, rather than the layers and layers of details.

    These comments highlight a misunderstanding. Planned Parenthood works to support women’s rights, health, freedom and the full range of choices. Our sex education and outreach programs all start with abstinence as the only 100% effective way to avoid pregnancy and STDs.

    97% of our business is health care: birth control, cancer screening and STD/STI testing. We help women make the decision that’s right for THEM: whether that’s adoption, abortion OR carrying the pregnancy to term.

    Right now we’re fighting to make birth control prices affordable to low income women: http://www.plannedparenthood.org/college-students-and-low-income-women-need-your-help.htm

    We almost all agree: birth control IS basic health care. Hope you’ll add your voice to this fight.

  • invalid-0

    Outlawing abortions, not providing birth control, no education or tolerance of an individual choice or life decisions will bring a market for illegal abortions and butchers as health care providers.

    We need to not just lend a voice but remind others of the consequences of not providing or tolerating Pro-Choice and the means of social healthcare facilities that provide such services.

  • invalid-0

    Just a few facts. As a practicing Catholic, who also uses NFP (Natural Family Planning) I can tell you there is an effective all natural alternative to pumping your body full of birth control chemicals, chemicals with significant side effects. Before you say NFP is ineffective, look up the studies, more than 99% effective, and all natural.

    It is sad that people like Laura (in the article) fall for the lie that we are running out of resources so we need to reduce our population. This Malthusian myth has been debunked thousands of times over the last few hundred years. The easiest way to debunk it is to plot the price of bread over the last 250 years. Over the entire time bread has become cheaper and cheaper, even with vastly more mouths to feed. This is due to human ingenuity. She says “we, as a country, use so much of the world’s resources…” She apparently is ignorant of the fact that the US produces far more than it consumes, so even though we have in her words “this opulent culture,” we give the world so much more than we use. Even more important, it is sad that she puts things ahead of people. She reminds me of the lady who aborted her child to save the planet. But that begs the question, save the planet for whom? If we all followed this “logic” the human race would be extict in a generation with no one left to appreciate the planet.

    Lastly any first year medical textbook will contradict the assine statement made by “Brittney,” “A lot of people don’t support contraception because they believe life starts at conception, which requires egg and sperm to meet,” she says. “But you can put egg and sperm together all day without a baby coming together. (When an egg and sperm meet a unique and separate human being is created.) She continues, “It needs to attach itself to the uterus to make a baby.” (Totally her belief to help her sleep at night but not supported by scientific facts.) She goes on, “That’s why contraception is okay. It simply denies the third element required for pregnancy.” (New flash, you are pregnant the moment sperm and egg meet in conception. If you want to justify contraception that’s your right, but do try to live in reality based on facts.) Some birth control methods, not all, but some are abortificient in that they induce an early abortion by not allowing the fetus (latin for offspring) to attach to the uterine wall. Everyone reading this response has in the past attached to their mother’s uterine wall, to deny the fetus to do so as well, will end that person’s life. To deny an innocent person of their life is in fact “a grave evil” and hence we arrive at the position of the Catholic Church.

  • marysia

    Thank you for this thoughful article sharing the voices of those who both oppose abortion and support reproductive justice measures.  Although, it is a stance that goes beyond Roman Catholics…

    People who take such perspectives are not alone, we are many.  We simply need to organize better and work more systematically with people of all persuasions on abortion to relieve its root causes.

    I am involved with an online, global guide to abortion-reducing resources that takes this very sort of prolife/pro reproductive justice perspective:

    Nonviolent Choice Directory

    http://www.nonviolentchoice.info

    Anyone who wishes to join in this effort and find community there, you are most welcome to get in touch at editor(at)nonviolentchoice(dot)info

  • invalid-0

    Just a few facts. As a practicing Catholic, who also uses NFP (Natural Family Planning) I can tell you there is an effective all natural alternative to pumping your body full of birth control chemicals, chemicals with significant side effects. Before you say NFP is ineffective, look up the studies, more than 99% effective, and all natural.

    …but it’s a not a good excuse for ending the use of artificial birth control. I also would like to know the URLs for the studies which back up this 99% effective claim.

    Lastly any first year medical textbook will contradict the assine statement made by “Brittney,” “A lot of people don’t support contraception because they believe life starts at conception, which requires egg and sperm to meet,” she says. “But you can put egg and sperm together all day without a baby coming together. (When an egg and sperm meet a unique and separate human being is created.) She continues, “It needs to attach itself to the uterus to make a baby.” (Totally her belief to help her sleep at night but not supported by scientific facts.)She goes on, “That’s why contraception is okay. It simply denies the third element required for pregnancy.” (New flash, you are pregnant the moment sperm and egg meet in conception. If you want to justify contraception that’s your right, but do try to live in reality based on facts.)

    Excuse me? *raises hand* But medical science does agree with Brittney. The American College of Ob/Gyns says pregnancy doesn’t begin UNTIL implantation.

    Some birth control methods, not all, but some are abortificient in that they induce an early abortion by not allowing the fetus (latin for offspring) to attach to the uterine wall. Everyone reading this response has in the past attached to their mother’s uterine wall, to deny the fetus to do so as well, will end that person’s life.

    Some contraceptives (such as Plan B)could cause a fertilized embryo to fail to implant,but that is not the same as causing an abortion. An abortion is termination of a pregnancy. But if there is no pregnancy if the embryo didn’t implant, so there cannot be an abortion.

  • harry834

    I just read through it, it is a good refresher of reality of individual feelings on the issue, and how people of different views can come together to support prevention measures, like comp sex ed.

    The world should teach ALL methods of contraception – pills, NPF, condoms, IUDs, diaphargms, respectful conversation with one's partner.

    Only then we we – the multidiverse people – will have the knowledge to live the lives we choose with the best possible practices to support those lives.