Powerless in Prison: Sexual Abuse Against Incarcerated Women

"I am 7 months pregnant [and] I got pregnant here during a sexual assault. I have been sexually assaulted here numerous times! The jailers here are the ones doing it!"

— excerpt from a letter from an inmate in a jail in Alabama to Stop Prisoner Rape.

Surviving a sexual assault and then navigating the health care system to receive adequate counseling and reproductive medical attention is daunting enough for those who walk freely on the outside. For women in prison, these hurdles can seem insurmountable. Unfortunately, sexual assault, particularly guard-on-prisoner sexual assault, is a fact of life for many incarcerated women, and the ensuing implications for their reproductive health are many.

The power dynamics in prison severely disadvantage the prisoner, who is at the absolute mercy of her guards and correctional officers, relying on them for necessities such as food and for the small privileges and luxuries such as cigarettes. Guards have unlimited access to prisoners and their living environment, including where they sleep and where they bathe. With such an imbalance of power, the likelihood of sexual assault increases. Sexual abuse in prison can range from forcible rape to the trading of sex for certain privileges. While the latter may seem consensual to some, the drastic power disparity makes the idea of "consent" almost laughable. In fact, all 50 states have laws that make any sexual contact between inmates and correctional officers illegal, "consensual" or not. "It's always unacceptable and illegal," says Lovisa Stannow, executive director of Stop Prisoner Rape.

While guard-on-prisoner sexual assault is common, putting a number on the instances is difficult because so many assaults are unreported. As with sexual assault on the outside, many survivors in prison are ashamed and embarrassed to come forward, fear that their claim will be hard to prove or fear that their attackers will retaliate. In prison the fear of retaliation is heightened, as the prisoner continues to live with her attacker controlling her daily life. And inmates who report a sexual assault are frequently put in segregated isolation, ostensibly to protect them from retaliation, but this isolation can be emotionally and physically draining, and well, terribly isolating. And many women in prison have been sexually abused in the past, before they were incarcerated, or are accustomed to using sex to get what they want, on the inside or the outside. "A lot of women don't view it as abuse," says Deborah Golden, staff attorney at the D.C. Prisoners' Project of the Washington Lawers' Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs. About 80 percent of women inmates have already experienced some kind of sexual or physical abuse before prison, says Sarah From, director of public policy and communications at the Women's Prison Association.

Despite the widespread underreporting, some statistics exist. First, there are about 200,000 women incarcerated in the U.S. (in federal, state, local and immigration detention settings), a number that is growing exponentially and that makes up about 10 percent of the total prison population. Amnesty International reports that in 2004, a total of 2,298 allegations of staff sexual misconduct against both male and female inmates were made, and more than half of these cases involved women as victims, a much higher percentage than the 10 percent that women comprise of the total prison population. It can vary from institution to institution, but in the worst prison facilities, one in four female inmates are sexually abused in prison, says Stannow.

The risk of pregnancy as the result of a sexual assault is, of course, a concern for many survivors, incarcerated or not. But obtaining emergency contraception or an abortion, if one is desired, may be more difficult for women on the inside. Because many inmates do not report the sexual assault immediately (if at all), using emergency contraception is usually not possible, if it is even available. While prisoners' rights and reproductive rights organizations report hearing few complaints about emergency contraception being inaccessible to women in prison, they are unconvinced that it is widely available. Golden believes emergency contraception should be made readily available and should be on the prison's prescription formulary.

Unlike access to emergency contraception, access to abortion by inmates has seen its way through the courts. Crucially, women do not lose their right to decide to have an abortion just because they are in prison; rather, the issue is how the prison accommodates (or refuses to accommodate) her decision. "There are constitutional minimums," says Diana Kasdan, staff attorney with the ACLU's Reproductive Freedom Project. Although the details can vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, prisons must provide access to an abortion if one is desired. "Providing access" can range from providing transportation to an off-site medical facility, to allowing for a furlough or to providing abortions on-site, although Kasdan says she has not heard of the latter. A court in Arizona recently ruled that a court order to obtain transportation for an abortion cannot be required, and a federal court in Missouri ruled last year that a prison cannot refuse to pay for the transportation of inmates to receive abortions.

Paying for the abortion itself is yet another issue for women inmates, and it is a patchwork quilt of inconsistency throughout the states. Some state prison systems fund abortions, some states refuse to pay for what they consider "elective" abortions and some states simply have no official written policy, research by Rachel Roth has shown. Only two states specifically mention sexual assault in their prison abortion policies; both Minnesota and Wisconsin allow for government-subsidized abortions when the pregnancy results from a sexual assault. The federal Bureau of Prisons also pays for the abortion in the case of sexual assault.

In prison, the possibility of a coerced abortion can hang over an inmate who discovers she is pregnant as the result of a sexual assault by a guard. In a letter to Stop Prisoner Rape, one inmate writes:

A rumor had spread through the facility that I was pregnant. I'm not sure how the rumor got started, but medical staff came to my cell and forced me to provide a urine sample that they could use to test for pregnancy. They did not ask me any questions, offer me any support, or seem at all concerned for my well-being. That same night, three guards, two female and one male, came into my cell, sprayed me in the face with mace, handcuffed me behind my back, threw me down on the ground, and said, "We hear you are pregnant by one of ours and we're gonna make sure you abort." The two female guards began to kick me as the male guard stood watch. The beating lasted about a minute, but it felt like ten or more. Afterwards, the male officer uncuffed me and they left.

The prisoner's rights as a mother, if she becomes pregnant and chooses not to terminate the pregnancy, are complicated, to say the least. Few jurisdictions allow women to keep their children in prison with them once they are born. Frequently, if there is no family member on the outside to take the child, the child will enter the foster care system, and the state will move to terminate the parental rights of the mother because she is absent. The parental rights of mothers in prison is a fraught and complicated issue, one that goes well beyond the particular problem of sexual assault by guards.

Access to counseling after a sexual assault in prison is virtually nonexistent. An inmate cannot simply call a hotline, since all calls are monitored and she has no privacy. When one inmate sought mental health care from prison services after a sexual assault, she was offered sleeping pills, says Golden. "There's no capacity in prisons for talk therapy," she says. And any counseling inside the prison is not confidential. Some community therapists will come in on visiting days to counsel an inmate, but usually only at the behest of a lawyer, says Golden.

Despite the overwhelming power imbalance, guard-on-prisoner sexual assault is preventable, insists Stannow. Efforts such as making sure the staff is well trained, educating the prisoners about their rights, eliminating impunity for guards and following up on reports of sexual abuse would go a long way toward prevention, she says. Congress had similar goals in mind when it unanimously passed the Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA) in 2003. PREA aims to establish zero-tolerance standards of sexual assaults, to increase data and information on the occurrence of prison sexual assault and to develop and implement national standards for the detection, prevention, reduction and punishment of prison sexual assault. "PREA has been enormously important in ending sexual violence in detention," said Stannow. "Congress made clear that it's a problem that must be addressed." Perhaps most excitingly, PREA created a federal commission to generate binding national standards regarding sexual violence in detention. But "the existence of the law doesn't mean the problem is gone," Stannow continues. "Now we need to make sure that we build on the momentum of the law to make every corrections system in the country acknowledge that sexual violence in detention is a major problem, and does everything it can to end it."

One of the largest obstacles to eliminating prison sexual assault is the "social invisibility" of prisons. The general public neither knows nor cares about the plight of the incarcerated, and thus cannot demand that its government properly protect prisoners' bodily integrity and rights. Perhaps PREA is the beginning of the end of this social invisibility.

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

For more information or to schedule an interview with contact press@rhrealitycheck.org.

  • invalid-0

    “WHY do Men Rape Women?” This question is a simple as it is sublime. And the answer is just as basic: because Men can forcibly overpower women with greater AGGRESSIVENESS! Note (…and IMPORTANTLY so…!) that I did NOT say greater “strength.”

    For “over-Powering,” by dint of even the most non-etymological interrogation of this term, has more to do with LEVERAGING power, than with HAVING power inherently. Men’s greater physiological access to power comes into play only AFTER they have manipulated both the Situation, and the Woman, to a power-diminished stage that thereby enables the man to use the power that he has just, effectively – LEVERAGED.

    Of course, Women have their own Power-source; one EQUALLY potent as a leveraging-tool. What, and how is this Women’s Power deployed? It is her OWN propensity to be either AS aggressive, or to act as COUNTER-aggressively as the Man. I make the above assertion noting once again that “power,” and the manner in which it might be wielded Human-against-Human, has more to do with AGGRESSION than with natural Strength. For example, when the attention-grabbing “action movie’s” opening scene, or even the nightly news media, provide “their” audiences with sensational Words-and-Pictures of a woman’s so-called “Brutal rape and Murder,” what do WOMEN (…as The Next Possible Victims of such a crime…) do/discuss next day – at the water cooler? At the office cafeteria? At the after-work bar? Probably the latest movie. Most likely how their plans for next month’s holiday are coming along. Anything, in fact, than the fact that, according to the SAME news media watched by their MALE colleagues, MALE friends and MALE family-members: “a woman was Brutally Raped – BY A MAN and Murdered – BY A MAN last night.”

    For such real and real-life discussion would be considered too “unsettling” for their MALE social peers. And we all know how Woman – as trained so to be, “prefer” to be Visually and Verbally “decorative.” The Nice, Pretty Outfit….that satiates the Male Gaze. The Nice, Pretty-Light Conversation…that does not offend Male Sensibilities. Hence, WOMEN DELIBERATELY CEDE THEIR POWER TO RETALIATE AS POTENTIAL MALE-VICTIMS…CHOOSING, WITH NAUSEATING SADNESS INSTEAD…TO PRETEND – SELF-DEFEATINGLY SO – WITH THEIR NON-AFFECTED MALE ASSOCIATES – THAT NOTHING OF ANY VITALLY DISCURSIVE IMPORTANCE HAS HAPPENED TO ANYBODY…OF ANY VITAL IMPORTANCE.

    In short, Women at such times effect severe psychic self-damage, by shift-shaping their Social WOMAN-Selves, or their Corporate WOMAN-Selves, or even their Familial WOMAN-Selves, into a NON-AGGRESSIVE FE-MALE BODY whose MIND…via her POTENTIALLY-AGGRESSIVE MOUTH…; and whose ATTITUDE… via her POTENTIALLY-AGGRESSIVE ACTIONS/WORDS…do not ‘ATTACK’ and ‘WOUND’ these Male Representative-SYMBOLS of, and causative to, her own suffering.

    Thus, as far as deployment goes, Women INVARIABLY CHOOSE NOT TO self-access this their OWN Self-EMPOWERING…and ultimately Life-saving tool of AGGRESSION.

    As such, it may be said that while Women NEVER “Ask” for Rape or any form of Male-attack, they invariably “Non-Negotiate” their AGGRESSIVE POWER away to such a state of nothingness, that inexorably causes this real and really-effective Power, to be ignored and ultimately devalued/not feared by Men. Men to whom Women instead CHOOSE TO hourly-and-daily give NOTHING – word or deed, of themselves to be Feared. To be Avoided. To Render these same Men-would-be-Attackers UN-comfortable within Women-as-potential-Victims’ presence.

    In fact, Women tend to DELIBERATELY (…and with futile cowardice…) “aid” men during such debates. For when Men shift Rape’s topic-focus onto matters of “Dressed like a Slut..,” or “…She asked for it…,” Women do NOT ratchet up the topic-gear into “DRESSED LIKE A SLUT?…BUT MEN RAPE FILTHY HOMELESS/STREET PEOPLE…” or: “ASKED FOR IT?…BUT MEN RAPE BABIES-IN-PAMPERS…(sometimes their OWN!)as their OWN verbo-cognitive COUNTER-ATTACK. Women instead seek desperately to place as much dress-standard distance between themselves (as “Nice-and-Nicely-Dressed Women”) and the Rape Victim (as an – agreed – Half-Dressed Slut), as is possible. What does this achieve – for the Woman, and for the Man? The Woman thru’ (DELIBERATELY!) ceding her AGGRESSIVE COUNTER-ATTACK option, effectively donates her own POWER over to the quota already being wielded against her by the Man. Perhaps that is why Women talk about feeling “helpless..,” or “out of their depth..” during such debates. They FEEL the heavy weight of their own AGGRESSIVE-POWER, but psycho-socially inscribed “weaknesses” such as Decorum, and Taste undermine what should amount, and inevitable so, to POWER-DEPLOYMENT. So that instead of AGGRESSIVELY DEPLOYING THEIR OWN POWER WHEN ATTACKED BY MEN, Women do what they “see” themselves Made-to-Do in Male-Created Movies doing in the Movies. And yes, we have ALL seen these scenes, have we not? The Male-threatened Woman with fumbling/trembling/inept hand pointing the Gun (..as – even in the movie, her ACCEPTED Weapon of Aggressive Power, held by her, and as such ACCEPTED to be used by her AGAINST the Man..)- only to drop it, and ultimately to “lose” her momentary “control” of the Man/Situation. A “loss” that results in the Woman inexorably (..and DELIBERATELY..!) TURNING HER OWN SELF BACK INTO A MALE’S VICTIM!

    And such is the EXACT case with Women’s deliberate Non-accessing of their own POWER OF AGGRESSION in dealing with Men in real life. During Social, Corporate and Familial inter-action. Men will continue to be allowed (..by Women…)to Rape Women, as long as Women continue to allow Men to exist within a corporate and/or socio-familial COMFORT ZONE; one that continues to be NON-AGGRESSIVELY CHALLENGED by THE POWER OF A WOMAN TO – PUBLICALLY – CALL/SEE/ACCUSE/BLAME MEN AS THE RAPISTS THEY THEMSELVES CONTINUE TO FEEL FREE TO BE -IN PRIVATE.

  • harry834

    your distinction between inherent strength and leveraged strength. I also like how you acknowledge that aggression has a legitamite place in conducting the conversation against ignorance.

  • harry834

    I hope every man reads Denise's comment below because I think its important for understanding how the comfort zone plays a role in silencing needed conversation. Thank you, Denise.

  • invalid-0

    Interesting article, though extremely biased against men and very poorly written. The article has so many qualifiers and caveats as to embarass Swiss Cheese.
    The author’s obvious bias is clearly delineated by the fact that she readily acknowledges that almost half the accusations of sexual abuse are filed by men in prisons, though she feels no compulsion to mention the barbarity of what men go through. Apparently it is of no concern to her since she mentions nothing of their plight which is much more difficult then a woman’s.
    The author also confuses the term Sexual Abuse with a woman freely utilzing sex as a means to obtain what she wants. Under the definition of “sexual abuse,” logically it is SHE that is doing the abusing.
    Furthermore, the article implies that all guards are male, when in reality the majority of the guards are female. Unfortunately the article does not clearly state this.
    Lastly any woman raped by a male guard has the option of accusing the guard and also having a rape exam.
    And should a woman become pregnant via sex by a prison guard, she can always have a DNA test done to establish both paternity and guilt.
    It certainly would be nice to read an informative article without the misandric bigotry and misinformation.