Solutions for Sex-Selective Abortion Become Problems

This is the fifth post in a series of articles examining sex-selective abortion in India, by our Global Perspectives correspondent Deepali Gaur Singh. For the complete series, please click here.

Yet another person in a remote village of Bihar in eastern India gets elevated to the position of a goddess. For years the rhetoric used to justify and even make excuses for the condition of women is that Indian society (read Hindu) is amongst the very few where women enjoy the status of goddesses. And one just needs to turn to Indian scriptures for the evidence. Women who die on the pyres of their husbands are made goddesses. In life they would have had an existence worse than the cattle at home (for those who own cattle)! The latest incident is of a conjoined twin (conjoined with her headless twin) whose parents – poor laborers themselves – found hope in Bangalore doctors who came forward to operate upon Laxmi (their daughter) who requires at least two people to assist her with the most basic daily tasks. The villagers back home are angry with the parents as they see her as a reincarnated goddess and wish to deify her by building a temple in reverence to this eight-limbed little girl. What this entails is that she live the rest of her life just so out of respect for this spectacular tribute to her. Laxmi and her mother are still lucky considering in some parts they might have been treated as witches and lynched.

Ironically, the incident sums up the situation of so many women in India and similar societies in Asia. Traditional, socially-sanctioned jobs, duties and expectations are thrust upon them without their say even if it involves their own lives or that of the daughters they bear. How many women are really able to decide if they want to selectively abort their female fetus; how many women can decide on family planning or contraception; how many women willingly send their under-age daughters as young brides for much older men in far-flung places having more often than not endured the same ordeal?

The recently concluded Fourth Asia-Pacific Conference on Reproductive and Sexual Health (4th APCRSH) at Hyderabad, India, was the forum to discuss the dangerous trend of preference for male children over female all across Asian societies, apart from other extremely contentious issues. While the imbalance in sex ratios in India has become an issue for repeated debate over the past year or so, it is the methods being employed to contain it that have really caused deeper concern especially since the time for experimentation has practically run out. If matters have to be rectified, policies have to be sustainable and have to work.

With newer technologies made available for people to aid them in the process of fertility and conception, the issue no longer is going to be about sex selective abortion. It is now a larger moral issue of wanting only male children as opposed to a female child — particularly since the technology to do it is going to be an arm's length away. There was a time when female infanticide was condemned, but it took quite a while to realize that increasing numbers of people no longer had to go through the motions of ‘accidentally' killing the female infant since the option of selectively aborting the female fetus became available with newer, cheaper technology. And with even better technology available for pre-selection, even the method of repetitive pregnancies and sex selective abortions for acquiring a male child would become redundant. So are we looking to penalize people for using the technology or penalize people for making an unfair distinction between the male and female child? What about people who have not/will not have access to these technologies due to their economic conditions, but will discriminate between male and female children by way of education and daily nutrition? Or sell their daughters in marriage to the highest bidder to get rid of the responsibility of caring for her?

Despite many of her questionable schemes (like the cradle scheme and the more recent registration of pregnancy to maintain a ‘state watch' over sex selective abortions) and the controversial "don't trust men" remark more recently the Indian Union Minister for Women and Child Welfare, Renuka Chaudhary at the 4th APCRSH raised the crucial need to increase men's assimilation and participation in addressing the sex ratio imbalance, the factors responsible for it and related issues of women's sexual and reproductive health. Considering women rarely have a say in decisions at their marital homes and even if they do they are more often than not shaped by their own position in both their paternal and marital homes they are an important component in any sustainable change in social attitudes and structures. And thus, while laws need to be in place to punish the guilty, a more enduring change would come not out of fear of the state and its laws but the damage to the social and familial fabric that such retrograde practices and structures do.

The case study of a young girl who went through seven pregnancies one after the other, all for a male child, is a story oft heard. Some of her babies didn't survive even five days — not to mention the health implications on this young woman. Though the story of a girl from Pakistan this could very well be that of any woman trapped in a patriarchal set-up where a male child is welcomed with celebrations and a female with despondency. And with an increasing number of families, across cultures in the continent, actively avoiding daughters due to excuses ranging from the ritualistic need of boys in the Indian culture or as a retirement plan for those in China, the social implications in the region are not hard to imagine. Studies by the UNFPA suggest a similar scenario in Nepal and Vietnam which only makes the situation even more precarious for women in these countries vis-à-vis human trafficking.

Asia has already lost out on 163 million women by virtue of this imbalance. Missing women or surplus men — however you look at the situation the imbalance comes with immense socio-economic implications. The difficulty in finding brides has already been witnessed in parts of India with instances of polyandrous marriages. Besides, being a virtual gold mine for those earning their millions from human trafficking, with heightened insurgency and terrorism making countries like India flashpoints, the chances of this surplus male population being recruited by armies might become another dangerous reality. Removing gaps between men and women – gaps in education, health, nutrition, human rights and laws etc. – is the only real solution to remove this Sex Ratio at Birth (SRB) gap.

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

For more information or to schedule an interview with contact

  • invalid-0

    Having said that women enjoy little agency is issues of family planning and sex-selection wouldn’t it also be true that women themselves desire a male child quite often and would go to great lengths to achieve that? Its interesting how the middle class has cozied itself to the idea of family planning and see the advantage of a small family with two children, however, ironically their ‘progressive’and ‘modern’ mind set stops there as they woould prefer two male children and would go to great lengths to ‘manage’ that.

  • invalid-0

    We actually have something similar to the Cradle Scheme in the United States that works quite well! We used to have a huge problem with teenage, young, or unwed mothers abandoning their babies in dumpsters and other places where the baby was sure to die, or killing the baby and then hiding the body. As a solution, in many states the local police departments, hospitals, and child protection agencies are REQUIRED to receive unwanted babies directly from the parents without any repercussions or prosecution.

    When the problem is that people are abandoning babies, providing a safe place to leave the baby without fear of repercussion can be a fantastic solution, but will only work IF the parents see the baby as a life worth saving. It has worked very well here in the USA, but occasionally, callous or uninformed people here still abandon or “accidentally” kill their babies.

    In India, with the skewed social viewpoints about the relative worth of boys versus girls, I am not sure if the parents will feel that the life of a baby girl is worth going out of their way to a drop-off point rather than simply “accidentally” allowing the baby to drown, die in their sleep, suffocate, be left outside, etc…

    The root problem is that in India, boys are generally seen as having more worth than girls. But until the root social problem is fixed, if properly handled the “cradle scheme” bears a try and can potentially save thousands, perhaps millions of lives! Who would adopt these girls? Well, if Indian parents aren’t interested in adopting female infants, I’m sure that many American and European families, from countries where there are never enough infants available for adoption, would LOVE to adopt a beautiful baby girl!