Can I Get An Amen?


We've been saying that there is vast support among Americans for the health and rights of women, even among self-identified conservatives and now I wish I'd placed some bets on it.

In a piece in this past Sunday's New York Times magazine entitled "The Evangelical Crackup," David D. Kirkpatrick quotes Bill Hybels as saying that conservative Christians are telling their leaders, "We are interested in the poor, in racial reconciliation, in global poverty and AIDS, in the plight of women in the developing world."

Let me reiterate that last part. Bill Hybels, founder of the megachurch, Willow Creek Community, near Chicago, and cited by Kirkpatrick as possibly the single-most-influential pastor in America, said, "interested…in the plight of women in the developing world."

Now, what made me drop my cup of tea was not that the conservative Hybels cares about women in low-income countries. As I've mentioned, nobody thinks women should die in childbirth from preventable complications. Hardly anybody thinks violence against women is acceptable. And everybody thinks girls should have access to education.

And it is clear to anybody who is paying any attention that countries cannot develop to their fullest potential without the participation of half of their citizens. So I am not surprised that Hybels considers the challenges for women to be worthy of his church.

I am surprised that the public debate that I have been coveting (dare I say praying for?) among the Presidential candidates may emerge thanks to a leader in the movement that has so publicly sought to restrict the rights of women over the years.

Don't misunderstand me. I have always believed that most of the members of the Conservative movement supported the work of UNFPA. In fact, I have heard about a very conservative minister who sounds very much like me when he speaks of the need to elevate the status of women around the world so that they are not so vulnerable to maternal mortality and HIV/AIDS. I just never expected to hear one of their leaders give a public shout out to the "plight of women" around the world.

In all my daydreams on this issue, it was not the pastor in khaki pants and a polo shirt that stood up to the mic. But I'll be the first to hand the mic to Hybels if he will ask the Presidential candidates:

Are we the kind of country who uses global women's health for political expediency? Or are we a generous and noble country that promotes equality?

Forty million dollars is less than 1/100th of one percent of the federal budget. Is that really what the American public wants to contribute to safe motherhood, HIV prevention and girls' access to education around the world?

Senator/Governor, if elected, would you restore funding to UNFPA to assist in global efforts to promote women and reduce poverty?

In truth, I don't know what Bill Hybels thinks about UNFPA specifically but I'd be happy to have a discussion with him about how we in the "women's rights movement" could work with the members of the 12,000 churches in his network to promote women around the world. Can I, a Muslim American, get an "Amen?"

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

To schedule an interview with Anika Rahman please contact Communications Director Rachel Perrone at rachel@rhrealitycheck.org.

  • invalid-0

    Hi,

    It does feel like there is a seismic shift going on.

    As it is unlikely, ahem, that the current admin will re-fund the UNFPA, there are other ways to take advantage of this shift in opinion and get federal money to help women in the developing world.

    I truly believe that recruiting religious leaders and members of the right to co-sponsor non-controversial reproductive health initiatives like obstetric fistula relief and child marriage prevention gets them to make a commitment to women’s health, and if the next administration wants to restore UNFPA funding (!!), then they will be more sensitized and less likely to fight it so hard.

    There are 2 issues that are currently IN PLAY in Congress and NEED INPUT.

    The first is Obstetric Fistula funding–Congresswoman Maloney has introduced a bill that allocates money solely for the prevention and treatment of fistula–who can argue with emergency obstetric care? It is HR 2114, and it needs more co-sponsors.

    The second is Child Marriage. This site has a host of articles about the loss of adolescence, dreams, possibilities, that girls suffer from because of early marriage. There are House (HR 3175)n and Senate (S1998) bills that address this.

    If you want to learn more, you can read these bills in their entirety at http://thomas.loc.gov/, just type in the bill numbers.

    There are a myriad ways to help–talk to your friends and neighbors, host a themed coffee–if you go to http://www.sierraclub.org/population/greenpink/ you can get info for your friends–

    most importantly, contact your Senators and reps and ASK them to sponsor a bill–most of them just need a push to do the right thing–

    Write a letter to the editor of you local paper…

    and please, email me at reneedolney@yahoo.com, if you have any questions.

    Let’s get these bills passed THIS SESSION!! If things are better in 2008 with a different administration, then we’ll have strengthened our base even more and can ask for a BIGGER UNFPA and USAID budget!