Cracking Maternal Mortality


When you read this, I'll be at the Women Deliver conference in London, a gathering of non-profit leaders in the health and development community as well as ministers of finance and planning, parliamentarians and staff of non-governmental organizations from 30 low-income countries. We are all gathering to address maternal mortality.

I started my first post on RH Reality with this fact: You are hard pressed to find an American who thinks 529,000 women dying each year from preventable complications of pregnancy and childbirth is not a problem worth solving.

Some people – not many but some – find contraception controversial and there is, of course, the debate about whether we should spend money on condoms or abstinence to prevent HIV. But find me one person who thinks women should die giving life. There will probably always be some cases where women die in childbirth – the human body remains something of a mystery. But almost all of the deaths that occur today as a result of pregnancy and/or childbirth are preventable.

Most health indicators have improved over the last 20 years but not maternal mortality. It continues to plague women, mostly low-income women. And that's probably because there are so many factors that must be addressed. Smallpox required health care workers to immunize a vast segment of the population, an admittedly large task, but then those people were safe. A woman can reproduce over 30 years of her life and each pregnancy presents a new risk.

And each piece of the solution presents another set of challenges – trained health care workers need to be where the patients are, facilities need equipment, roads need to be maintained, ambulances need fuel. And these are the tangible problems. This doesn't even account for societal challenges.

A few weeks ago, my organization honored Salamatou Traoré, who runs a program for fistula patients in Niger. A trained midwife, Madame Traoré points out that in West Africa, women are supposed to bear children without crying. So they don't tell anyone about their pain or when they feel that something is wrong. Changing these societal expectations is a probably a greater challenge than building a road to the clinic.

If it weren't so complicated, this would be the kind of issue that finds its way to party platforms. But because it can't be explained in sound bites, it just hangs out there.

Instead, politicians largely ignore the issues in favor of more controversial issues over which they can beat up their opponents (condoms vs. abstinence, etc.). In the media, we get sensationalized stories about celebrity marriages, murders and even domestic violence. Of course, the media also covers some key international women issues. For example, on October 7, New York Times front page article on rape in Congo. A light should be shined on that issue.

But I find myself often annoyed about discussions on global women's health and rights. I care deeply for the rape victims and the fistula patients. And I see these problems as a part of a broader challenge. By focusing exclusively on a series of egregious and tragic examples of the most extreme cases of society failing women, we lose sight of the fact that, in many parts of the world, it's bad for your health just to be a woman. Why are we not concerned with the millions of women who marry, have children, do what they can to feed them and hope that their lives are better? Why don't these women – not the brutalized or dying, but the merely poor – deserve our attention, too?

If we found a way to end fistula, that would be a wonderful thing for the two million women who suffer from it. If we could prevent early marriage, economic development would improve around the world.

But if we could crack maternal mortality, we would truly change the world. (Or if we changed the world – or at least women's place in it — we could crack maternal mortality.) Shouldn't the United States, where maternal mortality is one tenth what it is in other parts of the world, lead that charge?

The Women Deliver conference is being billed as a landmark global conference to focus on creating political will to save the lives and improve the health of women, mothers and newborn babies around the world. Our leaders should be ashamed that we have to build political will.

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

  • invalid-0

    Your Story and information has inspired me. It helped me with my topic me and my partners Sam and Kaylin want to say thank you for helping.

    keep up the good work!

    <3
    //Sam
    //Kaylin
    //Shelby.

  • invalid-0

    Hello, i just want to thank you for all your help(:
    Your information has inspired me to make a change in the world.
    WE THANK YOU!

  • invalid-0

    Hi Anika,

    I have been mulling over your post for weeks(in a good way), and I have finally found the time to post a comment.

    I was talking with a friend today, and Niger came up. Niger is the 2nd poorest country on the planet, with a combination of high maternal mortality, high child marriage, lots of cases of obstetric fistula, environmental degradation, and armed conflict. As my friend said “it’s the perfect storm”.

    The question then becomes how to fight it, how to break in. Because of certain “moral”(cynical) political positions that the current administration espouses, if any $$$ is going to come out of this Congress to help woman in places like Niger, it will have to be to fight non-controversial reproductive issues, like Child Marriage and Obstetric Fistula. Ralph Reed himself has to admit that it is wrong for a woman to suffer for 6 days in labor–after all, in 99.99% of the cases the child dies.

    And to ask one’s Congressional representatives to support these issues, to sensitize them to the plight of women in the developing world, makes the next ask easier, so that when we get a new administration in this country, and UNFPA funding is restored, it can also be increased.

    There are currently 2 bills in the House–HR 2114 and HR 3175– and 1 in the Senate–S1998–that could really make a difference in women’s lives, and they have been carefully crafted to avoid the partisan hostility that UNFPA programs face

    HR 2114 provides money for preventing and fixing obstetric fistula and HR 3175/S1998 make child marriage something that the state dep’t has to track as a human rights violation and provides money to combat it.

    Both COULD PASS THIS YEAR.

    I think that anyone who cares about women should get behind these bills that are currently IN PLAY.

    To read these bills in their entirety, please go to http://thomas.loc.gov/ and enter their numbers.

    If you want to help advocate for these bills, call your member of Congress and ask them to sign on as a co-sponsor, write a letter to the editor, go to http://www.sierraclub.org/population/greenpink/ and get the tools to host a party to build awareness, or email me at reneedolney@yahoo.com.

    That is why I am focusing on them.

    Oh, and I had a nightmarish labor with my darling son, and if we hadn’t had access to emergency care, he would be dead and I would be dead or crippled, and I weep when I think about women who weren’t so lucky.